|
ShutterStock seems to be very profitable for most of microstock photographers, usually #1 or #2 earner. ShutterStock is also famous from how difficult for beginner is to get accepted there. You need 7 out of 10 pictures approved from your initial submission or you are welcome to try again in 30 days. It wasn't easy for me:
2 : 8
11/28/2007. I sent my first submission to ShutterStock as soon as I got accepted by iStock. Without much of the research I just selected pictures approved by iStock. The result: 8 of 10 of my pictures were trashed due to noise, grain, artifacts, and poor lighting. See you next month. Surprise, they didn't like my Polaroid transfers.
5 : 5
12/29/2007. I prepared my second submission more carefully. I don't use any noise reduction software, but I reduced size of all pictures to a minimum required by Shutterstock (4 Mp) and avoided pictures with sky areas. All pictures were from my iStock portfolio. The result: only one rejection due to noise, but other 4 due poor or uneven lighting, or shadows. or white balance may be incorrect. Progress?
5 : 5
2/01/2008. The 3rd submission: I included 5 pictures which were not rejected by ShutterStock previously. Some of them were trashed this time, but for reasons like
"not in focus or focus is not located where we feel it works best." Also, a new rejection theme showed up: "limited commercial value." See you in 30 days, thank you very much!
8 : 2
3/05/2008. My 4th submission - a couple of old pictures and mostly new ones. Two simple backgrounds. The results: finally accepted! Two rejections were due to limited commercial value (well, there are selling at iStock...). Anyway, the 8 picture portfolio started to bring some quarters even on the very first day at ShutterStock.
|